Viewed 16311 times
The Hockey Hall of Fame and Museum (HHOF) has a small display of Stanley Cup rings featuring some rather colossal examples of the type, as well as an older and more restrained band billed as “the first ring ever presented in 1893 to the Montreal AAA.”
The George S. Low Ring
The ring in the HHOF display belonged to William "Billy" Barlow, who was a member of the Montreal Hockey Club (MHC). The ring pictured above is another one from the same set presented to player “G.S. Low”. In 2009 it auctioned for more than $55,000, a price no doubt inflated by the idea that the Low and Barlow rings are “Stanley Cup rings” (see also here and here).
But are they?
Since there was no actual Stanley Cup competition in 1893, it seems a little early to be awarding rings. And the next ring in the HHOF display is from 1961, so the early one appears to be an outlier. What evidence is there that these 1893 rings should be considered “Stanley Cup rings”?
The Stanley Cup story begins in March 1892 , when vice-regal aide Lord Kilcoursie announced that Governor General Lord Stanley wished to donate a challenge cup for the hockey championship of the Dominion of Canada. He and his family had been taken with the game and wanted to encourage play, especially between the Quebec and Ontario leagues that had Ottawa at their nexus.
Excerpt from the Evening Journal (Ottawa), 1 May 1893, page 5.
The main idea was that the Cup would be the prize for a challenge competition between the champions of the elite hockey leagues of the era, the Amateur Hockey Association of Canada (AHAC) and the Ontario Hockey Association (OHA). To get everything started, the Cup would be presented in the first instance to “the M.A.A.A. team” as the reigning champions of the AHAC, “until the championship of the [AHAC]… be decided next year [i.e., 1894], when the Cup shall go to the winning team.”
The MAAA (Montreal Amateur Athletic Association) team that was being specified was actually the MHC, which was technically just an “affiliated club” of the MAAA. The difference between an MAAA club team and an affiliate was subtle, but one that clearly mattered to the MHC men and this would soon lead to difficulties getting the Cup presented.
Oblivious to the potential for slights, over the next few weeks it was arranged for the other Stanley Cup trustee, Sheriff John Sweetland, to travel to Montreal to present the trophy to the MAAA. When he arrived at the annual meeting on 15 May he was probably quite surprised to discover the MHC’s executives had declined to attend the ceremony. The MHC members were apparently annoyed that the Cup was to be presented to them through the MAAA—and that the Cup had already been engraved with “MAAA” and not “MHC”.
To make a long story short, it was only after a year of negotiations and another AHAC championship that the MHC finally agreed to take possession of the Cup. After they did, they had it engraved “Montreal 1894”–there was no reference to the MAAA.
So, what about those rings?
In the spring of 1893 the MHC was celebrating not just that season’s AHAC championship, but their sixth in a row—every year of the AHAC except the first in 1887. To mark this accomplishment, the MAAA executive wanted to recognize the players’ efforts with a gift (even though it was only an affiliated club, apparently). This followed a long amateur tradition of rewarding championship teams with non-monetary prizes, like jewelry. So on 24 April 1893 the MAAA board of directors formed a sub-committee “to procure suitable trophies for the members who played on the championship matches during the past season and thus assisted in winning the Hockey Championship for the seventh year [sic] in succession, said trophies not to exceed a cost of ten dollars each.”
Proposals were gathered, and at the next MAAA board meeting on 1 May 1893 it was “unanimously decided to accept the ‘Ring’ design.” (Notice that this meeting took place the same day in as the rules for the awarding of the new Stanley Cup were announced in the pages of the Ottawa Journal and The Gazette in Montreal.) The rings were ready in time for the 15 May annual meeting two weeks later, when Sweetland showed up with the Cup.
Extract from of 15 May 1893 annual meeting, page 315, MAAA Minute-book, Montreal Amateur Athletic Association fonds (MG28 I 351), Library and Archives Canada.
Curiously, the minutes of the 15 May meeting do not mention the rings at all (pages 315-316/image 213). However, a newspaper article about the meeting in The Gazette (partially transcribed here) noted that “souvenir rings” were presented at the meeting to celebrate “the championship for seven [sic] years in succession.” (The rationale for the reference to seven years of championships, not six, is not clear.) Paul Kitchen refers to another source, presumably the Montreal Daily Herald, that notes MHC captain Tom Paton was also given a Heintzman piano, a gift that would have been worth several hundred dollars.
Although the presentations of Cup and rings were planned for the same night, there is no mention of a connection between them, and in fact they were being given for two related, but different things. The Cup was being given to the 1893 AHAC champions; the rings were being given to the six-time AHAC champions. Nor do the two rings that we know about today (of the nine that appear to have been produced) make a material link to the Cup—both are engraved with “Champion 1888—1893” to acknowledge the six consecutive AHAC championships won by the club, but there is no mention of the Stanley Cup.
While it is possible that the MAAA could have had advance notice of the awarding of the Cup to the MHC and factored that into the decision to award gifts to the players on 24 April, P.D. Ross had only drafted the rules the day before, and there is no evidence he immediately conveyed the decision to present the Cup to the MAAA. And even if it had been widely understood (for weeks or even months) that the MHC were to be the first Cup holders, the MAAA did not take the opportunity to engrave this information on the rings. Admittedly there was not a lot of space to do so, but there is also no record of explicit verbal or written evidence that notes any connection between the rings and the Cup.
The most telling aspect is that the rings were a one-off event, and no lasting tradition was created. (This makes sense if they were only for the six-time championship recognition). In fact, no rings explicitly for a Stanley Cup win appear to have been made until well into the 20th century. In the 1920s, baseball and football began producing rings for their champions, and the NHL-era Cup rings that we see seem to come well after that. This absence of a continuing Stanley Cup ring tradition is what most clearly communicates that the appearance of these AHAC championship rings and the Stanley Cup in the same month of 1893 was at best just a happy coincidence.
 The following account is based on primary source research and Paul Kitchen’s “They Refused the Stanley Cup,” although I should note that Kitchen implicitly accepts that they are Stanley Cup rings.
 By taking the 1894 AHAC championship the MHC had become the first “winner” of the Cup (as opposed to its first holder). In March 1895, they also became the first winners of a challenge series (as defenders), but had to immediately turn over the Cup to Montreal Victorias, who had become that season’s AHAC champion. Yes, it was a little complicated.
 Digitized from the MAAA fonds held at Library and Archives Canada.
 The AHAC had been in existence for seven seasons, but the MHC did not win the first one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_Hockey_Association_of_Canada
 Though it is not clear when and where the rings were accepted by the players, there is no evidence they were refused, which might have been the case had there been a Cup connection. On the other hand, the rings were engraved “MHC”, not “MAAA”.
J. Andrew Ross is an archivist at Library and Archives Canada and the author of Joining the Clubs The Business of the National Hockey League to 1945.
Viewed 16311 times
Mystery Player - Solved
Posted December 20, 2018
Celebrating a Half Century of Recognition
Posted July 02, 2018
Team Identification. Can You Help?
Posted June 23, 2018
What's new with the old NHL stats?
Posted April 01, 2018
Unidentified Hockey Team
Posted January 23, 2018
2017 Members Hockey Pool in Support of Road Hockey to Conquer Cancer
Posted September 12, 2017
Silver, Gold and “Ding”
Posted August 19, 2017
Stats Not So Golden for Seals
Posted July 15, 2017
The Inaugural Season
Posted June 15, 2017
Who Really Has the Record of Most Coaching Wins for the Boston Bruins?
Posted May 16, 2017
Alfred "Ralph" Winsor
Posted May 03, 2017
Mystery Player on a Mystery Team
Posted March 27, 2017
Scarce On-ice Photo of the Philadelphia Quakers
Posted December 17, 2016
Percentage of US players in the NHL - 1920 to 2016
Posted December 04, 2016
Pre-NHL Stanley Cup Challenge List
Posted November 17, 2015
The Fickle Finger of Fate
Posted March 08, 2015
Whose Mayor's Cup — RPI's or Union's?
Posted February 15, 2015
Hyperbolic Reporting in Hockey
Posted February 01, 2015
The Curse of the Maple Leafs
Posted January 18, 2015
Thoughts on J. P. Parise
Posted January 11, 2015
Watching the 1964 Olympic Hockey Final
Posted December 21, 2014
Two Great Events in Bracebridge Hockey History
Posted December 14, 2014
Two Great Events in Bracebridge Hockey History
Posted December 14, 2014
The French Canadian Rule
Posted November 30, 2014
Wasn’t That a Party!
Posted November 16, 2014
Posted November 11, 2014
Notes on the RPI-Union Route 7 Rivalry, Halloween Weekend 2014
Posted November 09, 2014
THE PUNISHMENT SHOULD FIT THE CRIME
Posted October 19, 2014
Sweeney Schriner And The Dangers Of Back-Checking
Posted October 05, 2014
AS IT HAPPENS - 50 YEARS AGO TODAY IN HOCKEY!!
Posted September 28, 2014
The Strangest Game
Posted September 21, 2014
Who's To Blame for the Free Angent Frenzy
Posted September 07, 2014
Dogs, Cats, Cups & Cars
Posted August 10, 2014
Entering Wally's World
Posted July 27, 2014
Lament for the Blockbuster Deal
Posted July 20, 2014
One Game Wondered
Posted July 13, 2014
Conn Smythe Gets One Wrong, Sort Of
Posted July 06, 2014
Kings-Rangers Stanley Cup Final Series at a Glance: Goals and Penalties
Posted June 29, 2014